2025
Chat with Jekyll and Hyde
Clinical ethics scenarios for health students. You pick a messy situation, a bad doctor has already given terrible advice, and you talk it through with a chatbot that is meant to be the better colleague in the room.
We had a pile of ethics scenarios for health students: you see a colleague’s name on a scan list, a patient is worried about radiation, someone wants to leave against advice. I started with HTML cards and a file of responses, ethical and unethical, because I wanted something to argue with in a class, not a blank chat box.
Then it grew a conversation. You pick a case, the system already has a bad course of action on file, and ChatGPT is told to be a doctor who is also teaching. Keep it short. Stay in the scenario. Ask a question back. The name on the page is Chat with Jekyll and Hyde. The idea is that the awful suggestion has already happened, and now you are talking about it.
It is a classroom prototype, not a product.
The mashup
Ethics cases, a pile of terrible advice, and ChatGPT as the colleague who has to unpick it.
AI-generated guess of the mashup mix, 1 to 5. Click a stat.
Ethics 5/5: Colleague’s scan on the list, radiation questions, confidentiality, fitness to practise.
Tags
Built with
Explore Further
Another health-teaching toy from the same general drawer: spin a characteristic, deal a scenario.
Notes to self for media to add
- Hero: two speech bubbles, one labelled Hyde with a clearly terrible suggestion, one labelled Jekyll asking ‘why is that a problem?’. No real patient details.
- Screenshots: scenario picker (six cards); start of a chat with dummy text; finish-chat thank-you. Blur or rewrite any live model output.
- Short demo: pick scenario 1 → Hyde’s bad idea appears → student types → Jekyll asks a question back. Keep it under a minute.
- YouTube Short: “I asked the bot for the unethical option first.”
- Privacy: these are fictional clinical cases but still. No student chats, no API keys, no GitHub, no live URL if it is passworded for a class.